Another observation I thought I'd comment on.
It appears you asked your question, not because you were trying to decide for yourself what is right and wrong and was wanting input from others to further your internal thoughts on the matter, but, rather, came here hoping for others to give you a form of permission to do what I think you already know is wrong. This is demonstrated by two things that are very obvious.
1. You blamed the neighbor, calling him a "DumbA**" which is a way of saying that he is at fault for your behavior of hijacking his internet connection. It is a form of relieving yourself of the responsibility for your own actions. You're not at fault, he is, for leaving his network vulnerable.
2. The only person in which you thanked in this thread was the person who expressed an opinion of agreement with your position. Had you thanked all parties, including those who disagreed but offered other thoughts for consideration, then it would indicate an overall desire for the opinions of others. But by thanking only the person who said what you were hoping to hear, it indicates that you were wanting others to give you permission to do what you want to do. That way, you bare no personal responsibility for your actions because "others said it was okay."
No matter who agrees or disagrees with you and no matter how ignorant your neighbors may be in regards to computer networking, your decision to hijack someone else's internet is your decision and your decision alone. And you alone bare full and complete responsibility for that decision.
It appears you asked your question, not because you were trying to decide for yourself what is right and wrong and was wanting input from others to further your internal thoughts on the matter, but, rather, came here hoping for others to give you a form of permission to do what I think you already know is wrong. This is demonstrated by two things that are very obvious.
1. You blamed the neighbor, calling him a "DumbA**" which is a way of saying that he is at fault for your behavior of hijacking his internet connection. It is a form of relieving yourself of the responsibility for your own actions. You're not at fault, he is, for leaving his network vulnerable.
2. The only person in which you thanked in this thread was the person who expressed an opinion of agreement with your position. Had you thanked all parties, including those who disagreed but offered other thoughts for consideration, then it would indicate an overall desire for the opinions of others. But by thanking only the person who said what you were hoping to hear, it indicates that you were wanting others to give you permission to do what you want to do. That way, you bare no personal responsibility for your actions because "others said it was okay."
No matter who agrees or disagrees with you and no matter how ignorant your neighbors may be in regards to computer networking, your decision to hijack someone else's internet is your decision and your decision alone. And you alone bare full and complete responsibility for that decision.


Comment