Unless of course the fish you keep are kept to preserve the species - which as hobbyist fish keepers none of us have probably ever considered nor have the ability to properly do.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Great Hybrid (Flowerhorn) Debate
Collapse
X
-
This is precisely what I'm talking about actually. Check out the HCCC CARES or ACA CARES programs. All I'm saying is let's prevent other species from getting to that point. And I actually have several species registered on those CARES lists. I know several people in Texas who do as well. I'm not being critical of anyone who doesn't, including keepers of Flowerhorns. I'm just saying that next time you have a tank open...maybe consider it. And talking about fish and conservation, to my way of thinking, very much belongs with the hobbyist. For if not us, who else?
-
Different cultures do different things. Other cultures/people don't understand the reasons behind it. From a "hobbyist" standpoint, not all hobbyist are against hybrids. There's always groups of people who try to persuade other people to sign their forms and petitions, that doesn't mean anything.Last edited by Kiovo; 02-21-2009, 01:53 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
What's best for each hobbyist is that they take care of their fish so that the fish are happy & healthy.
To get into the semantics of fish & environment conservation does NOT belong in the same realm as hobby fish keeping. Otherwise there would be no hobby as ALL these fish we keep were removed from their environment to live in tanks - which as a conservationist is morally wrong. Unless of course the fish you keep are kept to preserve the species - which as hobbyist fish keepers none of us have probably ever considered nor have the ability to properly do.
I would compare it to being a model-railroad hobbyist, but spending your days worried about possibly supporting railroads that have destroyed nature preserves somewhere in America and then campaigning about it - not to the railroads - but to other model-railroad hobbyist.
This is a hobby. Nothing more.
Leave a comment:
-
You're getting your feathers ruffled a little overly much...I'm giving my opinion, nothing more. I haven't said the average Flowerhorn keeper is treating his fish inhumanely. In fact, I believe quite the opposite is true. I believe that I'm entitled to my opinion just as you are. I can't tell you to do anything. The question that I asked was more of a philosophical one...does a cultural issue outweigh other factors? I don't depend on the Flowerhorn business as I don't sell them. Are you aware that in Great Britain stores are being asked by the hobbyist groups to sign a no hybrids, dyed, tattooed pledge?
Leave a comment:
-
I can understand that....but whether it's cultural, lack of education, or just plain irresponsible people doesn't make it better for the hobby or for conservation. Does the fact that something may be cultural give people a pass on doing and/or understanding what is right from a hobbyist or conservationist standpoint?
Leave a comment:
-
There is a lot of mis-information about flowerhorns. People do get them for the wrong reason, (ie. thinking it will bring them good fortune, health, and wealth). These same people also happen to be majority Asian! Asian people (not all cultures) tend to be supersitious, its a cultural thing.
Leave a comment:
-
It doesn't cause a conflict of interest. When I became HAS president, I didn't give up my right to my own personal opinion. If anything, it should give me stronger reason to support conservation and the betterment of our hobby. HAS is an all inclusive club...that's part of the beauty of it. HAS has spawned spinoffs over the years which are more specialized. Furthermore, please understand that while I have a responsibility not to do anything on here or anywhere else which would reflect poorly on HAS, throughout this post I have never once tried to insinuate that this is the opinion of HAS or its members. My opinions are my own. They are based upon quite a few years of experience and knowledge. There is a lot of mis-information going on about Flowerhorns (such as the LFS store employee brought up in Delock's post). I was hoping to educate people on the conservation, hobbyist, and, as it has happened, scientific issues in this debate.
Leave a comment:
-
I think it adds a different aspect to the hobby. Yes there are many "natural" fish to choose from to keep but there are also many irresponsible fish keepers who keep these natural fish. Just like they're irresponsible people who keep hybrids. Fish keeping is a hobby and each person gets to choose what fish they want to keep. It's suppose to be fun and relaxing and just because you don't agree with the choices doesn't mean its counterproductive to the hobby. As far as conservation goes, if we really wanted to conserve and protect the natural fishes, then we should keep them in their natural environment. I'm keeping a fish that wasn't taken from it's natural habitat, all it's known is a tank. I can't help there are people over in the East who are dumping unwanted hybrids into rivers and streams. But again there are people here in Texas that are dumping non native fish into our waters.
Leave a comment:
-
I think it has nothing to with with one's associations since it's respect for another's personal preferrence. Being part of any club would not matter IMO.Originally posted by jeebus View PostWell, at least we all know where you stand. I'm curious though, as president of HAS, if it creates a conflict of interest when interacting with HAS members that have hybrid fish?
Leave a comment:
-
Well, at least we all know where you stand. I'm curious though, as president of HAS, if it creates a conflict of interest when interacting with HAS members that have hybrid fish?Originally posted by marauder_77868 View PostYes...I think intentional man-made hybridization where fish (especially cichlids) are concerned is not only unnecessary, but also counterproductive to the hobby in general.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes...I think intentional man-made hybridization where fish (especially cichlids) are concerned is not only unnecessary, but also counterproductive to conservation and really the hobby in general.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: