Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What's your setup

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • barrettsline
    replied
    Originally posted by myjohnson View Post
    Bunch of fancy camera folks not postings fish pictures.
    +1. Shamefully I've been lazy and busy with baseball. Where's your pictures? You gots a fancy camera too!

    Leave a comment:


  • myjohnson
    replied
    Bunch of fancy camera folks not postings fish pictures.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFantasticG
    replied
    Hm. For me the main reason is the Canon 65mm MP-E and MR-14EX. Plug and play on the EOS-M. There's no other lens on the market like the MP-E. I also like the idea of using it for astrophotography because of how little it weighs (affect on the GEM decreased).

    Leave a comment:


  • soymilk
    replied
    What's the appeal Of the eos-m over any other evl system?

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFantasticG
    replied
    Come October I'll be picking up the Canon EOS-M ... And I know someone who will be enjoying a well taken care of new to them Canon 60D.

    Oh, and the Nikon 1 uses a smaller than DX CMOS sensor... So it's not the same one they use in their DSLRs but the quality is still very very nice.

    Leave a comment:


  • soymilk
    replied
    Theirs kinda a niche market but they do make über p&s cameras. They do relatively well considering they cost as much as a Dslr setup.


    800 bucks


    600 bucks

    Most photogs get something like a canon g12 as an advance point and shoot.

    Leave a comment:


  • sunkenmetal
    replied
    They probably don't make point and shoots that preform like DSLRs because they think no one will pay for them.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFantasticG
    replied
    Originally posted by ssrprelude View Post
    I don't consider cameras like the Sony N5 or Nikon 1 point and shoots. They both have interchangable lenses and the same sensors as a dslr. They are handy to have and take great pictures but if it doesn't fit in your pocket its not a p&s to me.
    I was actually referring to cameras like the Nikon P7100 and Canon S95, not the interchange lens cameras such as 4/3rds, Micro 4/3rds, and Other mirrorless cameras that use APS-C/DX cameras. Even though the Fuji X100 does qualify as a P&S by those standards. :)

    Leave a comment:


  • soymilk
    replied
    Lol, I wanted one sooooo bad last year. I was gonna get it 2-3 times. But decided to wait on the nex 7. Might wait a few months and see if the price drops on the nex a little more.

    I love the form factor of the x100 but paying that much for just one fixed lens is kinda crazy to me. Not to mention the raw thing was weird. You have to press raw for the next picture to be raw, and then do it again. It only applies to the next picture.

    Wish the lenses on the nex didn't stick out so much.

    Leave a comment:


  • madugo
    replied
    X100?

    Leave a comment:


  • soymilk
    replied
    I've had my eye on a Sony hxv9 but that Canon s100 looks pretty awesome too. Sony has better video, canon has better stills.... Decisions decisions.

    Sometimes you don't want to take the whole camera kit, and you don't wanna look like a tool using your iPad.

    Leave a comment:


  • soymilk
    replied
    Prob hardest thing for p and s camera is low light or night pictures. This is where Dslr camera excel but in the past few years has been pretty interesting for p and s.

    Sony came out with a backlit CMOS sensor it looks like it helps a lot for dark shots. Then there's twilight mode. Basically the camera takes 3-5 shots really fast and kinda mixes them all together to get a clean high ISO shot. Pretty cool.

    Leave a comment:


  • myjohnson
    replied
    Yeah, point and shoots are really stepping it up.

    I still like to see a pocket size camera perform like a bigger one.

    I have two P&S cameras. DSLR just can't beat the small size. Very easy to travel with the P&S.

    Leave a comment:


  • soymilk
    replied
    All depends light, how much of it, and viewing format.

    I remember a few years ago they thru up a canon point and shoot against a canon Dslr and a medium format camera. It was taken outside, a picture of a forrest. It was then printed on a 8x10 and passed around to newbies and pros. Majority of people couldn't tell the difference between a 300 dollar point and shoot vs a 20k+ digital back.

    Some of the high end point and shoots are pretty nice nowadays. I need to buy one but I'm feeling cheap

    Leave a comment:


  • tbui1178
    replied
    +3

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X